 
To get a reference to an array:
$aref = \@array; $anon_array = [1, 3, 5, 7, 9]; $anon_copy = [ @array ]; @$implicit_creation = (2, 4, 6, 8, 10);
To deference an array reference, precede it with an at sign (@):
push(@$anon_array, 11);
Or use a pointer arrow plus a bracketed subscript for a particular element:
$two = $implicit_creation->[0];
To get the last index number by reference, or the number of items in that referenced array:
$last_idx = $#$aref; $num_items = @$aref;
Or defensively embracing and forcing context:
$last_idx  = $#{ $aref };
$num_items = scalar @{ $aref };Here are array references in action:
# check whether $someref contains a simple array reference
if (ref($someref) ne "ARRAY") {
    die "Expected an array reference, not $someref\n";
}
print "@{$array_ref}\n";        # print original data
@order = sort @{ $array_ref };  # sort it
push @{ $array_ref }, $item;    # append new element to orig arrayIf you can't decide whether to use a reference to a named array or to create a new one, here's a simplistic guideline that will prove right more often than not. Only take a reference to an existing array to return the reference out of scope, thereby creating an anonymous array, or to pass the array by reference to a function. For virtually all other cases, use [@array] to create a new array reference with a copy of the old values.
Automatic reference counting and the backslash operator make a powerful combination:
sub array_ref {
    my @array;
    return \@array;
}
$aref1 = array_ref( );
$aref2 = array_ref( );Each time array_ref is called, the function allocates a new piece of memory for @array. If we hadn't returned a reference to @array, its memory would have been freed when its block, the subroutine, ended. But here a reference to @array is still accessible, so Perl doesn't free that storage, and we wind up with a reference to a piece of memory no longer accessible through the symbol table. Such a piece of memory is called anonymous because it has no name associated with it.
To access a particular element of the array referenced by $aref, you could write $$aref[4], but $aref->[4] is the same thing, and clearer.
print $array_ref->[$N];         # access item in position N (best)
print $$array_ref[$N];          # same, but confusing
print ${$array_ref}[$N];        # same, but still confusing, and ugly to bootIf you have an array reference, you can only access a slice of the referenced array in this way:
@$pie[3..5];                    # array slice, but a little confusing to read
@{$pie}[3..5];                  # array slice, easier (?) to readArray slices, even when accessed through array references, are assignable. In the next line, the array dereference happens first, then the slice:
@{$pie}[3..5] = ("blackberry", "blueberry", "pumpkin");An array slice is just syntactic sugar for a list of individual array elements. Because you can't take a reference to a list, you can't take a reference to an array slice:
$sliceref = \@{$pie}[3..5];     # WRONG!To iterate through the entire array, loop with foreach or for:
foreach $item ( @{$array_ref} ) {
    # $item has data
}
for ($idx = 0; $idx <= $#{ $array_ref }; $idx++) {
    # $array_ref->[$idx] has data
}Chapters 8 and 9 of Programming Perl; perlref(1), perlreftut(1), and perllol(1); Recipe 2.13; Recipe 4.6
 
Copyright © 2003 O'Reilly & Associates. All rights reserved.